Comparative Analysis Of Montana 1948 And The Crucible

Although set at different times in American history, Larry Watson’s revisionist novel Montana 1948 explores corruption in justice and Bentrock’s nepotistic community. The allegorical play The Crucible’ depicts a society of submissive people who are subjected overtly religious authorities that eventually lead to disorderly societies. Miller suggests that crisis situations can reveal one’s true nature and may insinuate preconceived ideas of ideas that divide communities. It can be easy for people to blame others in order to make others feel guilty. These accusations can lead to an ill-formed society and show how power manipulation can endanger others. Both show societies in which justice is distorted in order to protect reputation. It shows that men are in control of their societies and have the power to destroy women’s superiority. The characters’ depictions show how those in power manipulate the system to their advantage.

Both texts examine a time in crisis when those in power are threatened by their reputation. Miller shows in The Crucible how individuals can use their reputations to benefit themselves and cause havoc for Salem. John Proctor’s dilemma of confessing to wrongdoings leads to a tainted reputation. Similar to the Montana moral dilemma, Hayden is faced with conflict. Wes must choose between upholding the law and remaining loyal to his family in Montana 1948. Gail stated that “crimes were supposed to go unpunished” which influenced his views. Wes, as the ultimate Sheriff in Mercer County has the power to enforce the law. He is torn between his family’s reputation and the needs of the community. It is clear Montana’s example shows that reputation matters, whereas the Crucible depicts how people use their reputation to keep their status. Miller shows the injustice faced by women despite their persistent pleas for freedom, by describing Tituba as a slave who has limited power. Miller’s stage direction implied that women do not have superiority. Tituba was seen “falling down on her knees” seeking mercy and freedom. The Crucible is an example of the lack and corruption that exists in Salem, fueling the hysteria about witchcraft. The Hayden family holds the majority of power in Bentrock, Montana 1948. Frank is the one who sexually abuses Native American girls and murders Marie. Frank, who sexually abuses Native Americans and murders Marie Little Soldier is unlikely to be indicted for the crime. This is contrary to common belief. It is the dominant men who hold the most power in their communities. Men use that power to control women, which leads to inequalities.

The Crucible as well as Montana depict a world where those in power can use the justice system to their benefit. Wes Frank and Julian are able to control Montana’s justice system. This is demonstrated when Wes tells Gail, “They can’t arrested us-we are the law”, emphasizing the fact that they hold most of the power. Frank is eventually locked up in the basement, rather than being sent to jail, as he tries to keep his loyalty. The audience learns that Wes is a Sheriff and can manipulate Bentrock’s justice system. Danforth also adheres to strict Puritan law. In order to avoid suffering, people may conform to dominant demands in desperate times. This is supported by the idea that Abigail and Mary Warren followed the same path.

People will be destroyed and divided when there is a breakdown in society that causes distress within their communities. The Crucible and Montana are two examples of this. They show that those in power can manipulate the justice system. Characters such as Abigail Williams, Montana Wes, and Mercer County sheriff are just two examples.

Author

  • davidwong

    David Wong is a 29-year-old educator and blogger who focuses on helping students learn in creative and interesting ways. He has a background in teaching and has been blogging since 2006. David's work has been featured on a variety of websites, including Lifehack, Dumb Little Man, and The Huffington Post.